Re: FHEM vs NodeRed vs OpenHab vs IoBroker vs HomeAssistant vs D. Beitrag von Weltenbummler18» , Fonzo hat geschrieben: ↑. Home Assistant Vs OpenHAB: Erstellung und Architektur. Wenn es um die Entwicklungs- und Designmerkmale der beiden geht, gibt es einen bemerkenswerten. Neben OpenHAB habe ich auch ioBroker und Home-Assistant in Erwägung gezogen. Meine Vision eines intelligenten Hauses. Aus meiner Sicht sind wenige. <
Welche Smart-Home Plattformim Smart Home OpenHAB, ioBroker, Node-RED und Home Assistant statt, um diese, anhand zuvor festgelegter Kriterien, in einem repräsentativen Smart. Home. Re: FHEM vs NodeRed vs OpenHab vs IoBroker vs HomeAssistant vs D. Beitrag von Weltenbummler18» , Fonzo hat geschrieben: ↑. Angefangen von OpenHAB, über FHEM, Domoticz und IO Broker, bis ich Durch die Home Assistant Erweiterung für VS Code können die.
Home Assistant Vs Openhab What is Home Assistant? VideoHow I built my Home Assistant touchscreen
The establishment procedure takes somewhere in the range of 20 and 40 minutes and it is very hands off. When it is done you can go into the web UI and begin including yours smart gadgets.
It is that simple. In the event that you have a Raspberry Pi 3, arranging the remote association is simple too. OpenHab 2 was discharged in with contacting a less specialized technical of people.
The new discharge incorporates Paper UI, another web UI that enables you to complete a lot of the arrangements without editting documents. On a fundamental level this is extraordinary, yet there is an admonition.
Paper UI still doesn't bolster every one of the highlights in OpenHab so regardless you need to proceed to do a portion of the setups altering the records.
I think the activity is still most of the way there yet once everything is bolstered, it will almost certainly achieve a great deal of clients that don't feel entirely good in a Linux situation.
Its fundamental drawback is designing things in two better places, Paper UI and the records. It isn't perfect to keep your design formed and to make ordinary reinforcements.
OpenHab can be as adaptable as you need it to be. It includes some major disadvantages however, it isn't the most simple framework.
The Web UI bolsters fundamental things, the power is still in the configuration records. In my opinion, I wouldn't fret managing that however I don't care for having mixed up setups.
It will deal with anything you toss at it. Having said that, the Xbase grammar isn't the least demanding one to manage.
When you need to make complex practices it can wind up difficult. There is also the flow-based development tool named Node-RED for managing the rules.
Since it was originally made for visual programming, you can use it to change configurations quickly. However, this is much more complex than the two methods mentioned above.
For the users who are even more advanced, Home Assistant has a tool called App-daemon which provides even higher flexibility and power for creating rules.
OpenHAB offers writing the automation rules in Xtend which is the more flexible and expressive sibling of its original language Java.
OpenHAB has a total of four available interfaces to meet different requirements. For installing the software, connecting devices, configuring them and all other kinds of system administration tasks, you will need Paper UI.
But since it cannot provide you all the solutions, you may need command line prompts. In order to control the connected items from mobile devices, you would need Basic UI.
If you are looking for a portable solution for the interface, you can use HABmin which offers both administrative and user functions.
Check all the necessary details in the same place with the dashboard UI of HABPanel. Home Assistant has a few options when it comes to user interfaces.
You can check all the connected devices and automation configurations from the default view. However, you can also customize it for new tabs and cards if necessary.
For better views on mobile devices like tablets and smartphones, you can use the Home Assistant Control Panel. It runs on a web browser which makes it easily accessible from anywhere.
From the comprehensive discussion and comparison above, it seems that there is no clear winner in the comparison of OpenHAB vs Home Assistant. The ideal choice among these two can vary depending on the preferences set by users.
Home Assistant offers better flexibility, easier automation rules and more frequent updates. On the other hand, OpenHAB comes with extensive compatibility, higher stability, lightweight structure and a large community of active experienced users.
Thus, you need to make the choice according to your particular requirements. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Skip to content When the technological world was getting bored with most of the new popular innovations limited to computers and smartphones, the home automation systems stirred up new enthusiasm regarding the future of our daily lives!
What is OpenHAB? Advantages of OpenHAB. Extensive Device Compatibility OpenHAB can work with a wide range of technologies, devices and services.
Automatic Discovery Soon after you finish the installation process, OpenHAB automatically discovers smart devices by scanning the local network.
Flexible Engine. Runs Anywhere In addition to the devices and brands, OpenHAB has extensive compatibility in the case of environments as well.
Stable Each upgrade of OpenHAB is done after going through a rigorous approval process. Large And Helpful Community.
Disadvantages of OpenHAB. Intimidating Installation Even though it has the automatic discovery feature, installing the software system fully can seem intimidating to some users because of their lengthy process.
Slow Development. What is Home Assistant? Advantages of Home Assistant. Wide Range Of Support Home Assistant will enable you to keep an eye on a wide range of smart devices and services.
Automatic Discovery Similar to OpenHAB, Home Assistant can also detect certain smart devices present at your house automatically using the discovery integration and then connect them one by one.
Friendly User Interface. Platform Compatibility You can deploy the Home Assistant Core program on any server running different operating systems like Windows, macOS or Linux.
New Releases Every 2 Weeks This home automation software likes to stay updated with the latest technological developments as early as possible.
Lightweight Compared to many of its biggest competitors, Home Assistant is much more lightweight. Disadvantages of Home Assistant Less Stability It is great that Home Assistant regularly updates itself with the latest changes and technological advancements.
Comparing Home Assistant Vs OpenHAB Uses Both Home Assistant and OpenHAB are highly popular software or platforms dedicated to providing you the best home automation experience.
History and Architecture. Installation And Configuration The installation process of both the systems has some similar stages like downloading the base image on hardware, writing on the SD card and then plugging it in Raspberry Pi.
Flexibility And Stability It would be tough to get both flexibility and stability with either of these systems.
Writing Rules. You then have to go and add a thing which is like an entity in Home Assistant, then add a channel to the thing, then finally link your channel to your item before you can even have it appear on the dashboard.
In previous versions of Home Assistant, much of the devices and automations were done in the YAML config files, users were required to manually edit these files to add devices.
Much of that has now been added to the Lovelace interface which is excellent, but some devices can still only be added via the config files. This should get better as time goes on but as it stands, could be a bit confusing for new users.
In terms of adding devices, Home Assistant in general requires much less time and steps in order to get a device into the dashboard than OpenHAB does.
Of course this is device specific, but in general I found this to be the case more times than not. OpenHAB also ships with 4 interfaces that it asks you to chose out of the box, which I found pretty confusing.
One of them, HABPanel was self explanatory in that its designed for tablets or wall panels, but the other 3 give you more or less functionality depending which one you choose.
You can add or remove them as you see fit in the future but the whole concept of having different interfaces I found particularly to frustrating and probably the weakest point of OpenHAB.
For example, if you choose the PaperUI which is the recommended UI in the setup, there is no way to do any automations out of the box.
However if you chose the Habmin interface, you have access to automations instantly. You can install the Rule Engine addon from the addon menu to give you the functionality in the PaperUI, but still I just found it particularly frustrating.
Having different settings and controls only be available in different user interfaces is an odd choice to me. I totally get that the PaperUI is meant to be simple and functional without being confusing to the user, but I think a toggle switch that shows or hides functionality would be a much better way of doing things, then you have consistent functionality across the interface, with the only thing that changes being the look and feel.
One small feature I did appreciate in OpenHAB was the ability to click on an addon and it will directly take you to the description page with all the options on the OpenHAB site.
Even adding devices to OpenHAB is much more complicated than I feel it needs to be. Fortunately, both OpenHAB and Home Assistant have huge amounts of supported devices, with all the big names supported.
Home Assistant calls these devices integrations and publishes the number of supported integrations right on the website and even breaks them down into categories for us.
At the time of filming, there are currently official integrations, I say official because there are large numbers of community add-ons available that probably takes this number up to roughly around OpenHAB, by contrasts, numbers are a little more tricky to work out, but according to their site there is currently bindings, with again all the major platforms supported from what I could tell.
Next up, lets talk native Mobile Apps. Mobile apps are a huge part of the Home Automation experience, and both Home Assistant and OpenHAB provide both Android and iOS apps.
Anyways, both apps will allow you to connect, view and control your platform remotely as well as send notifications and use voice control.
After that, there is some noticeable differences. Location tracking allows your device to periodically update its GPS location directly to Home Assistant, which is incredibly useful for using with automations.
OpenHAB can support GPS trackers, but only, as far as I can tell, with a 3rd party app like OwnTracks.
Home Assistant also supports actionable notifications, allowing the user to make a choice directly from the notification which the Home Assistant server will then act on depending on the input, again this can be incredibly useful when coupled with automations.
You can add devices, configure automations and scripts, change and edit dashboards straight from the app which I personally find really useful to just make quick edits on the go.
As far as I could tell, and please feel free to correct me, you cannot do this from the OpenHAB mobile app.
Using NFC tags within OpenHAB allows you to quickly and easy assign NFC tags to have certain functions, like control devices. Simply tap and hold the device you want to control, a menu will pop up and you simply scan the NFC tag.
After that you can scan the tag to control any device, a really excellent addition to the app! I definitely have to give the win to Home Assistant when it comes to the official mobile apps, the additional functionality it commands and the far superior customisation in terms of layout it has pushes it far ahead in this aspect.
If using the PaperUI you can use the rules engine add-on to create automations. You can create automations with a trigger, a condition and an action, so all the main things you would need really.
Home Assistant has a really similar setup where you can create automations really easily and quickly from Lovelace, with triggers, conditions and actions too, nice!
Both are pretty similar, and offer drag and drop, flow style editor for creating automations that makes it really easy to understand.
This is entirely subjective but I personally find NodeRED a little bit more intuitive with its linking system, having said that I was able to create a simple automation in HabMIN without looking at any documentation at all showing how easy it is, so your mileage may vary for which one you prefer.